From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 18 22:56:37 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8766F16A479
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:56:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC6243D45
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:56:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5IMuZVH019351
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 02:56:35 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 02:56:35 +0400 (MSD)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20060619024759.I13558@woozle.rinet.ru>
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
	(woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 02:56:35 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: 
Subject: puc and sio
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:56:37 -0000

Dear colelagues,

playing with puc compatible MOXA card I found that it's rather useless with 
contemporary DEFAULT kernel: 

- sio compiled in, puc as module - puc identified, but no sio ports detected, 
even when puc.ko is loaded by loader
- sio and puc both loaded as modules - all sio ports detected, but comconsole 
cannot be activated
- sio and puc compiled in kernel - all work flawlessly

Maybe it's time to consider including puc in GENERIC?

Other question is that PUC_FASTINTR is not enabled by default, but this may 
require checking for pci resources after card initializing...

Any thoughts?

Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------