Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:48:31 +0100 From: Michael Osipov <michaelo@FreeBSD.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?T=C4=B3l_Coosemans?= <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 77995e0fa8b5 - main - print/ghostscript10: update port to 10.03.0 Message-ID: <bf992f86-f2d8-4966-9dec-fa55d1188609@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20240313122903.23428bd8@hal.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <202403131034.42DAYHFo092927@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20240313122903.23428bd8@hal.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2024-03-13 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that the port depends on urw-base35-fonts. Is there a reason > for that? The fonts are already installed as part of ghostscript > in /usr/local/share/ghostscript/10.03.0/Resource/Font so it shouldn't > need urw-base35-fonts. I need to concur, GS comes only with type 1 fonts while that port contains metrics and true and open type versions. See: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/main/x11-fonts/urw-base35-fonts/pkg-plist compared to: > /usr/local/share/ghostscript/10.02.1/Resource/Font > $ file * > C059-BdIta: PostScript Type 1 font text (C059-BdIta 1.00) > C059-Bold: PostScript Type 1 font text (C059-Bold 1.00) > C059-Italic: PostScript Type 1 font text (C059-Italic 1.00) > C059-Roman: PostScript Type 1 font text (C059-Roman 1.00) > D050000L: PostScript Type 1 font text (D050000L 2.00) > NimbusMonoPS-Bold: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusMonoPS-Bold 1.00) > NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic 1.00) > NimbusMonoPS-Italic: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusMonoPS-Italic 1.00) > NimbusMonoPS-Regular: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusMonoPS-Regular 1.00) > NimbusRoman-Bold: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusRoman-Bold 1.00) > NimbusRoman-BoldItalic: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusRoman-BoldItalic 1.00) > NimbusRoman-Italic: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusRoman-Italic 1.00) > NimbusRoman-Regular: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusRoman-Regular 1.00) > NimbusSans-Bold: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusSans-Bold 1.00) > NimbusSans-BoldItalic: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusSans-BoldItalic 1.10) > NimbusSans-Italic: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusSans-Italic 1.10) > NimbusSans-Regular: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusSans-Regular 1.00) > NimbusSansNarrow-Bold: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusSansNarrow-Bold 1.00) > NimbusSansNarrow-BoldOblique: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusSansNarrow-BoldOblique 1.00) > NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique 1.00) > NimbusSansNarrow-Regular: PostScript Type 1 font text (NimbusSansNarrow-Regular 1.00) > P052-Bold: PostScript Type 1 font text (P052-Bold 1.00) > P052-BoldItalic: PostScript Type 1 font text (P052-BoldItalic 1.00) > P052-Italic: PostScript Type 1 font text (P052-Italic 1.00) > P052-Roman: PostScript Type 1 font text (P052-Roman 1.00) > StandardSymbolsPS: PostScript Type 1 font text (StandardSymbolsPS 2.00) > URWBookman-Demi: PostScript Type 1 font text (URWBookman-Demi 1.00) > URWBookman-DemiItalic: PostScript Type 1 font text (URWBookman-DemiItalic 1.00) > URWBookman-Light: PostScript Type 1 font text (URWBookman-Light 1.00) > URWBookman-LightItalic: PostScript Type 1 font text (URWBookman-LightItalic 1.00) > URWGothic-Book: PostScript Type 1 font text (URWGothic-Book 1.00) > URWGothic-BookOblique: PostScript Type 1 font text (URWGothic-BookOblique 1.00) > URWGothic-Demi: PostScript Type 1 font text (URWGothic-Demi 1.00) > URWGothic-DemiOblique: PostScript Type 1 font text (URWGothic-DemiOblique 1.00) > Z003-MediumItalic: PostScript Type 1 font text (Z003-MediumItalic 1.00) given that Adobe has now deprecated type 1 fonts in PDFs I consider this the right think to depend on this port. WDYT? Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bf992f86-f2d8-4966-9dec-fa55d1188609>