From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 01:05:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C00716A4B3 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 01:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skywalker.rogness.net (skywalker.rogness.net [64.251.173.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618C243FE9 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 01:05:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick@rogness.net) Received: from skywalker.rogness.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skywalker.rogness.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h958AoVs045379; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 02:10:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nick@rogness.net) Received: from localhost (nick@localhost)h958Akhm045376; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 02:10:50 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: skywalker.rogness.net: nick owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 02:10:45 -0600 (MDT) From: Nick Rogness To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20031004203310.GA60712@rot13.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20031005020513.C45148-100000@skywalker.rogness.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: joe@joe-lewis.com Subject: Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 08:05:13 -0000 On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:12:53PM -0600, Joe Lewis wrote: > > Question for you guru's; > > > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system. > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM, > which would be fine and dandy except for it is installed by default as > static. This means I PAM is now AM, because nothing is pluggable. And > the documentation on getting a 3rd party module to work is like slitting > your wrists and doing pushups in salt water. What is the PAM module? Where are you having problems, Compiling? How about some logs or error messages or something. How about the PAM module code itself? Send more info and as Kris suggested be a tad more professional or at least polite ;-P There have been PAM changes from 4.X to 5.X, mostly just changing a few things. I've had to change my PAM module several times, I do it by simply looking at existing PAM modules and determining what's changed. Nick Rogness - How many people here have telekenetic powers? Raise my hand. -Emo Philips