Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:39:53 +0100 From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> To: Dmitry Sivachenko <trtrmitya@gmail.com> Cc: Luca Pizzamiglio <luca.pizzamiglio@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Bernard Spil <brnrd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: net/haproxy 1.7.0 : libressl support Message-ID: <2A11D916-CC3A-4BD8-8830-77C6D3E7E521@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <B8F23906-D3EF-42CE-82E2-02D980FEF972@gmail.com> References: <CAB88xy-4B2GcgNmuc1wHwYqzCzr8Pn37AcqX3sV7OZ8Ryd3_yw@mail.gmail.com> <2C9DA2D0-81DD-40B3-9E43-FE5338D80844@gmail.com> <CAB88xy_XywZqKO1etMsVoKNsBQGfYyXVG0TFkNeXLJ%2BaJmK2pQ@mail.gmail.com> <B8F23906-D3EF-42CE-82E2-02D980FEF972@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 9 Dec 2016, at 11:51 AM, Dmitry Sivachenko <trtrmitya@gmail.com> = wrote: >=20 > If they reject it and refuse to support libressl for some reason, we = will not add your patches too, because this is not something = FreeBSD-specific. Strongswan developers said similar things. Unfortunately, we have very good support of LibreSSL in the FreeBSD ports tree since 2015. No reason to flush this down the toilet, not yet anyway if the patches work. We used to have this patch, it still fixes strongswan, likely fixes haproxy 1.7: https://github.com/opnsense/ports/commit/7e8ea59cabc I brought this up with LibreSSL developers, some other users from different BSD projects noted this needs fixing too. We're not there yet, but we can find a solution if everyone does their part in embracing choice for users. :) Cheers, Franco=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2A11D916-CC3A-4BD8-8830-77C6D3E7E521>