From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 24 8: 1:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from isris.pair.com (isris.pair.com [209.68.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4346337B4C5 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 509 invoked by uid 3130); 24 Oct 2000 15:01:28 -0000 Message-ID: <20001024110128.B610@electricjellyfish.net> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:01:28 -0400 From: Garrett Rooney To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20001023010526.A6883@dragon.nuxi.com> <200010240859.BAA13647@usr01.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1 In-Reply-To: <200010240859.BAA13647@usr01.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:59:36AM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:59:36AM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > Oh... and the PROVIDE/REQUIRE/WANT lists really, really want to > be "per service name" rather than per program name, so I could, > for example, have a service that depends on "smtpserv", and not > care if it was sendmail or qmail or whatever, only that there > was a protocol aware program sitting on the SMTP port, waiting > for a connection. i believe, from the quick look i took at this last night, that this is the way it is done, at least for mail servers, as there seems to be provisions for both sendmail and postfix (well, i remember postfix specifically, and i assume sendmail was there). -- garrett rooney my pid is inigo montoya. rooneg@electricjellyfish.net you kill -9 my parent process. http://electricjellyfish.net/ prepare to vi. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message