From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 16:21:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7404D237; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085A28FC0A; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA2GLASL092550; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:21:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA2GLAss092549; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:21:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:21:10 -0500 From: Brooks Davis To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) Message-ID: <20121102162110.GB92218@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20121102060818.GB48921@eureka.lemis.com> <201211021021.qA2ALJLF020996@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201211021021.qA2ALJLF020996@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com, grog@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:21:20 -0000 --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:21:19AM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100 > From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" > To: Erich Dollansky > Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) >=20 > On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 12:21:03 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:59:17 -0700 > > Steve Kargl wrote: > >> > >> BTW, the name of the language is "Fortran". It's been "Fortran" > >> for the last 30-something years. > > > > I never realised the name change. It seems that I am not alone with > > this. >=20 > Nor I. Looking at the Wikipedia page, I discover that it had been > spelt "Fortran" as early as 1956, and there's even a copy of the 1956 > Fortran manual online: http://www.fortran.com/FortranForTheIBM704.pdf > Interesting reading. >=20 > come on guys, fortran is not case sensitive... >=20 > Anyway I guess it's good news that LLVM > is being used also by Cray and Nvidia. > It's a shame though that, with LLVM as the > default compiler, further development of > FreeBSD/ia64 and FreeBSD/sparc64 > will probably suffer and then stop altogether. If you read either my annoucment or the diff closly you will note that the default it only changing for x86 architectures. -- Brooks --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFQk/L1XY6L6fI4GtQRAu1WAKDANoPoAyj2krsIvmuiEAgHtcQM1ACgqaxJ imXPKisgX8V8iusqnNX3WAI= =ByH2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN--