From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 7 09:02:04 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA10342 for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GndRsh.aac.dev.com (GndRsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA10335 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by GndRsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA05628; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:01:34 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199608071601.JAA05628@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Whither gcc 2.7? To: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199608071102.TAA11374@spinner.DIALix.COM> from Peter Wemm at "Aug 7, 96 07:02:31 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL11 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk ... > Thoughts? Is it worth abandoning the plans to do do a bmake import this > late in the game and switch to src/contrib (minus the non-x86 arch stuff).. Yes, it is worth it, but don't drop the non-x86 arch stuff, as then a few of us out here can play with makeing this work in a cross platform, otherhost, etc type of environment without a lot of hassle. > The more I think about it, the more I'm changing my mind and coming to the > opinion that we can do a lot more with it if the parts that we need go > into src/contrib with the bmake build points in the correct part of the > tree as usual. Remeber, what goes into src/contrib should be the _complete_ sources, with _no_ changes at all, otherwise we might as well go back to what we have been doing. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD