From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 19:25:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3898C16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:25:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C38143D2F for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:25:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 67598 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 19:25:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 19:25:51 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:25:50 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200411191202.iAJC2met062598@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20041119132016.S57560@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200411191202.iAJC2met062598@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: Michiel Boland Subject: Re: kern/72502: [patch] TCP should honour incoming RSTs even if the receive window is closed X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:25:53 -0000 On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > Synopsis: [patch] TCP should honour incoming RSTs even if the receive window is closed > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net > Responsible-Changed-By: arved > Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 19 12:02:29 GMT 2004 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > over to freebsd-net mailinglist for review > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72502 Wow, this bug has probably been the phantom cause of quite a few bug reports over the years - good catch! Sorry that nobody noticed the PR until now, we don't check the PR database that frequently. I love that it comes with a regression test, btw. We'll have to include that in the new regression testbench that was recently added. This should be committed within the next few days, sorry again for the delay. Mike "Silby" Silbersack