From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 30 07:52:29 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A227D106566C
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 07:52:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rdivacky@vlakno.cz)
Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [46.28.110.116])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664178FC16
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 07:52:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vlakno.cz (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id F02FB7F3810; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:52:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:52:24 +0100
From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To: David Marec <david.marec@davenulle.org>
Message-ID: <20111030075224.GA25155@freebsd.org>
References: <4EAC033E.6010201@davenulle.org>
	<20111030072842.GA23153@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111030072842.GA23153@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [9.0-RC1 FreeBSD] [amd64] buildworld fails on building
	lib/libss with CLANG
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 07:52:29 -0000

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote:
> This is a bug in clang, llvm supports "amdfam10" but the clang counterpart
> wasnt updated. Thank you for the report!

fwiw, I fixed it in clang r143305, so in the next import this will work just
fine :)

roman