From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 17 06:15:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4729106564A for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C988FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so23683fxm.13 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:15:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7QRw4vEmSFnw7nzk5imsp2foBr55G37SjSOA8NJo+YM=; b=WmYgi7IyLCF6rVv0nDlffrIDd8jwxvf43FNF9NveM13QlZm2wYiolwl01uXRMVpoUf UYrHQNAM44yc98RKp75t8Z4v12mOCx6ky8O0AG3lanbXSeMQuCaiDepjD9Fz/LJQLXOo GaHz20DUgK767ZwePTxNAW3ulKuhk9GLdRTOg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=rdIjUgEJ53DG2W75v/bPYd0KtQYwYGj2ivS2pjjLjzQuXcT4Kd/xT1kqZsDBGS+jz/ PZ1edR+CLXVNBSJrYpV7WqSyGCPhLSpAYNcPmDSab5Xcm0UCilhIcvCw9VYUEKScp44n KBDU3JHQelOU89xzDoet8OxcxiQmo07QtdPBw= Received: by 10.223.94.129 with SMTP id z1mr2046850fam.144.1308291304067; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:15:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.60.25 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:14:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5983C77D-13B7-4855-BDB0-A00E8D2BF2DE@gmail.com> References: <6F24ECDD-78FB-473D-A249-B76A3615D0AF@gmail.com> <5983C77D-13B7-4855-BDB0-A00E8D2BF2DE@gmail.com> From: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:14:44 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JIipTa0nS_mS0Nhkb32p9M-7aDA Message-ID: To: Lang Hai Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2nd deprecation campaign X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:15:05 -0000 2011/6/17 Lang Hai : > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public available distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be excluded from this depreciation. >> >> That is the way it is done, anyway there still could be some false >> positive having people to doulble check is always good :) > Agreed, but I just feel like these ports should not be in the depreciation list at the first place. That's my point my I could be wrong. >> >>>> >>> So yes, always give people chance to fix ports, not remove them from the tree. >>> >>> And, do we have a list of all maintainer-wanted ports, because that would be great if we have. >> Here you are :) >> http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=maintainer&method=exact&query=ports@FreeBSD.org >> > What if we just put all un-maintained ports in this list instead of in the depreciation list? They already are in this list :) That is this list I'm trying to cleanup >> >>> Regards, >>> Hai Lang >> >> regards, >> Bapt > > Regards, > Hai Lang_______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >