Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:08:45 -0700
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: switch vs bridge (fwd)
Message-ID:  <36FCF47D.403DECF3@softweyr.com>
References:  <local.mail.freebsd-net/199903262137.PAA06872@carp.gbr.epa.gov> <199903270103.TAA14685@free.pcs>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> 
> In article <local.mail.freebsd-net/36FC28DA.73DC2E28@softweyr.com> you write:
> >Mike Jenkins wrote:
> >> I find that rather useful.  I'm sure
> >> some folks use them for 80/tcp http redirection for web
> >> caching.
> >
> >Well, more likely for bandwidth/performance management and hot failover.
> 
> That's actually what the particular switch I have to deal with is
> doing; it an Alteon switch, set up as a transparent web proxy server.
> As I understand it, it intercepts all web traffic from the campus
> and directs it to a pool of proxies.  I suppose it's useful for what
> it does.
> 
> How would a layer-3 switch do the same thing?

VRRP.  Gee, why do something with a standard when we can "extend and
extinguish?"

-- 
       "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                 Softweyr LLC
http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr                      wes@softweyr.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36FCF47D.403DECF3>