From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 16:10:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD64E1065673; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6146D8FC19; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 928C8208BB; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <504B6DDB.4070700@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:10:03 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Emanuel Haupt References: <201209081537.q88FbuIf014285@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201209081537.q88FbuIf014285@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303914 - head/mail/nbsmtp X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:10:02 -0000 On 2012-09-08 17:37, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > Author: ehaupt > Date: Sat Sep 8 15:37:56 2012 > New Revision: 303914 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/303914 > > Log: > - Remove OPTIONS entirely; there is no reason to not use SSL or IPv6 in the > year 2012 Even I agree with you about IPv6, I just found out with the apache port that users are building specific machines explicit without IPv6 support Regards, olli