From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Oct 29 2:36:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7976415094 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 02:36:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19646 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 11:36:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA37666 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 11:36:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-10.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BC41509B for ; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 02:35:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Received: from [212.238.132.94] (helo=scones.sup.scc.nl) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 11h8RX-0002Jk-00; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 09:35:31 +0000 Received: from scc.nl (scones.sup.scc.nl [192.168.2.4]) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA37376; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 11:35:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Message-ID: <38196A5C.F4354C66@scc.nl> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 11:35:24 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: SCC vof X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer Cc: Nate Williams , "Daniel O'Connor" , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Jake Burkholder Subject: Re: rfork patch, please comment References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Julian Elischer wrote: > > but it will give us the inputus to produce something actually written > down. > > On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > > > Actually the kernel side of it would be quite quick.. > > > there is a user side component that multiplexes the user threads onto the > > > kernel threads but it's actually pretty straight forward. > > > > > > We may try give a bit of a talk about it a t teh next Bay Area freeBS > > > User's Group meeting.. As well as dicuss the other possibilities. > > > That'll give us a reason to get our act together. :-) > > > > Except that 99% of the FreeBSD developers don't got the the User's group > > meeting in the Bay Area. Either discuss Jake's work, or discuss the "elegant" solution in detail. There's no point in being vague and off topic at the same time :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message