From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 09:07:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796E116A4DD; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036DA43D49; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:07:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DAB10E792; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:07:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHWkJs3QVgAI; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:07:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833E010E791; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:07:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:07:58 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1893310735.20060828110758@rulez.sk> To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20060828054323.GC1411@gothmog.pc> References: <200602211640.k1LGe9UD002587@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060828054323.GC1411@gothmog.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: docs/93522: [patch] use rc.d script in example describing how to restart mountd in nework-servers chapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:07:56 -0000 Hello Giorgos, Monday, August 28, 2006, 7:43:23 AM, you wrote: > I think it is better to use either "mountd must be ..." or "The mountd > daemon must be...", but not what starts the newly added stuff above. > The order of the first sentence is slightly untasteful (the result > (having to restart mountd) precedes its cause (a change in the > /etc/exports file)). > The use of "it" is also a bit confusing. Does "it" refer to mountd or > to the file? HEY, isn't this PR already closed? ;-)) > Maybe we can use something like this? > + Every time a change is applied to the > + /etc/exports file, the > + mountd daemon must be forced to > + recheck this file for changes. This can be accomplished by > + invoking the mountd &man.rc.8; script > + with the appropriate parameter: > + > + &prompt.root; /etc/rc.d/mountd reload > + > + Please refer to for > + more information about using rc scripts, > + like /etc/rc.d/mountd. -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@rulez.sk