Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:50:43 +0200
From:      Robin Elfrink <elfrink@introweb.nl>
To:        Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Recovery from disk+fs crash
Message-ID:  <44859643.6030005@introweb.nl>
In-Reply-To: <56782.10.20.200.100.1149599550.squirrel@10.20.200.100>
References:  <44852CF1.5070300@introweb.nl>	<62208.10.20.200.100.1149598242.squirrel@10.20.200.100>	<44857BA4.90405@introweb.nl> <56782.10.20.200.100.1149599550.squirrel@10.20.200.100>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Anderson wrote:

> You could go in with fsdb and fix the parts manually, but it wouldn't be
> simple.  You might also try a 'preen' first - not sure if that will do
> anything different.  Also - this fs is not currently mounted at all,
> right?

I have no experience with fsdb, so that will take some time for me to
read the manuals.

The filesystem was mounted read-only just then, but fsck_uff -b 160
/dev/da0s1f only says it copies the block, and leaves the filesystem dirty.

root@:~# fsck_ffs -b 160 /dev/da0s1f
Alternate super block location: 160
** /dev/da0s1f
cannot alloc 188446744067446403432 bytes for inphead

UPDATE STANDART SUPERBLOCK? [yn] y


***** FILE SYSTEM STILL DIRTY *****


I tried with several backup copies (as newfs -N said it would make; this
is a standard install with no fs optimizations). All with the same result.


Robin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44859643.6030005>