From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 07:16:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2831716A41A for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C78B513C448 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 30068 invoked by uid 399); 22 Nov 2007 06:49:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2007 06:49:01 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <4745265B.2050407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:48:59 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> <47449199.5000403@FreeBSD.org> <20071122005011.07bad587@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071122005011.07bad587@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:16:00 -0000 RW wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 > Doug Barton wrote: > >> ... I have for some time wanted to add support >> to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports could install >> sensible defaults for rc.conf, > > What's the advantage of doing that over having the the defaults > in the rc.d script, I thought I explained that. The point of this thread was that services installed by ports are not (any longer?) on by default. What I'm proposing is a way to allow the user to choose to enable the service using an OPTION (amongst other things). Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection