Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:26:04 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, Giovanni Trematerra <gianni@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: deprecated TIOCSPGRP and TIOCGPGRP ioctl command Message-ID: <88ECC88C-1E3E-4FF1-A9AB-7105FF93ECBE@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGE5yCr9Sn6asv0ya4MNE5VQ5GnLQyzZyOvkq-dqOmtpcXExQw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACfq09210zdar=%2BM40gLoVtZnwLda88T1FJBbLXiy9e3t8-9NQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGE5yCor9c%2Bb7hZaF8NLdxc2F8PPfi0kTZFLXY5nvA%2Bbm1Ytuw@mail.gmail.com> <D2F25708-5E0B-4270-83F0-79286C5A581A@gmail.com> <CAGE5yCqSfJuemRgT7agTsydbBAJSrnAbyyoP3h%2BJ-JJMd1OAMw@mail.gmail.com> <CACfq093r9%2BFjAM5cOTJy=_f8_73qw-0x5GrSt3VYRg=B03UfsA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGE5yCr9Sn6asv0ya4MNE5VQ5GnLQyzZyOvkq-dqOmtpcXExQw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 10, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Peter Wemm wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Giovanni Trematerra = <gianni@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Thank you Peter, just last question on this. >> Having just one ioctl function for both pipe and fifo, would be a = problem >> having TIOCSPGRP and TIOCGPGRP implemented for fifo? >=20 > If the code is common, I can't imagine a plausible scenario where it > could cause a new problem. Yea, at most I could imagine someone writing an autoconfig script or = something that depends on this difference. However, I doubt there's any = autoconfig scripts that rely on being able to set them on a pipe, but = not on a fifo that would break. Oh, wait, that's assuming autoconf is sane, which may exceed the = evidence on the record... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88ECC88C-1E3E-4FF1-A9AB-7105FF93ECBE>