Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 16:28:41 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: desktop@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 269340] graphics/librsvg2: remove port Message-ID: <bug-269340-39348-WGzER7fH0Y@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-269340-39348@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-269340-39348@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D269340 --- Comment #3 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Charlie Li from comment #2) If no one is going to QA runtime then this port is garbage and should be ma= rked as FORBIDDEN or removed. Selectively adding workarounds for some Rust-based ports doesn't scale. Are you going to gatekeep Rust in any library with many consumers? What makes Rust so special compared to other stuff broken in qemu-user-static? To workaround qemu-user-static bugs just prefetch librsvg2(-rust) as binary package. If poudriere cannot prefetch dependencies due to out-of-date or ma= rked as IGNORE then fix it or hack the ports tree locally until it does. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-269340-39348-WGzER7fH0Y>