From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Jul 25 16:34: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ruhr.de (in-ruhr2.ruhr.de [141.39.224.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4A3837BBA7 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:33:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ue@nathan.ruhr.de) Received: (qmail 89606 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2000 23:36:07 -0000 Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.ruhr.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA11737; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:59:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ue) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:59:17 +0200 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Nik Clayton Subject: Re: Foo Message-ID: <20000726005917.Y66732@nathan.ruhr.de> References: <20000725001225.V66732@nathan.ruhr.de> <20000724201238.A20390@luna.osd.bsdi.com> <20000725132643.A12969@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000725132643.A12969@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>; from nik@freebsd.org on Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:26:43PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:26:43PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 08:12:38PM -0700, Jim Mock wrote: > > I think changing them is a good thing. Hint received. > Yes, it's valid, and no, we don't encourage it :-) This should really be > in the primer style guide. The patches (for the , not for the psg) are on their way. /s/Udo -- "I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit - it's the only way to be sure." (Aliens II) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message