From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Jun 16  5:52:44 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.83])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5317215402
	for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 05:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com)
Received: from localhost (billf@localhost)
	by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA03827;
	Wed, 16 Jun 1999 08:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 08:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>,
	dan.langille@dvl-software.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Mike Nowlin <mike@argos.org>
Subject: Re: named timeouts
In-Reply-To: <xzpyahkcq9x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990616084939.21488B-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 16 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> Doh! I inverted 'to' and 'from' in my head. Am I the only one to
> expect 'from' to come before 'to'?

I expect it this way too, just like PR reports...

'State-Changed: Open->Closed'

From->To just makes sense.

- bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org  -





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message