Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 07:10:07 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248474] NAT broken on IPsec/VTI [if_ipsec] Message-ID: <bug-248474-7501-juiZBrulsg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-248474-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-248474-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248474 --- Comment #20 from Michael Muenz <m.muenz@gmail.com> --- I have not tested too deeply but there *may* be strange side effects when u= sing filtering and NAT (SPD) when using route-based and legacy policy-based IPsec tunnels on the same system. If the *sense is just using route-based it should be OK. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-248474-7501-juiZBrulsg>