From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Feb 24 03:30:25 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B09955F292 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic309-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic309-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DlhJJ4ZL3z3hGr for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1614137422; bh=i+hs2ZrUx3c66ICQDpBZIEIOjjPOaPmXZtJtO9F/Wdt=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=S/+ZJRfEDNpD+TNjOAN/li6PJqgH+DuYvYO9U1MJnrwmcKO5jOfOW6W0jR6yzoiutspzU3/WF7GD4UQUcnZMbeVFPRbeqfZyulCvzFDn5k8qr5FYsB223LKAu43KEYxcuKzQ7Q/GJA8iUp5JnlBsMVlzxXWzY3owQsb88eeuSSR5RPBswP4+us4BNqJQgUt+cFSgLyX79br/VAIMdNZzFgKS1tu5p2UFScCgigd7DxVdPwe5GQQrQUIdIsyqh5/js5a2uLvpQK4zQjOeXBFZE3/AF83B4ghWWJGqAmLaQCVf6T04EWshFR1yJcsTvSD1Z4KajQfdG5PnR0+GP75zGA== X-YMail-OSG: jpjWTOMVM1ntZQISBxHJtmv4s1bFAIPD8B_6dtB6Tqef_V3t.uoyhjE7Yg6XQ1G 8rPewR205DkcsxmNm2qWXVCD794s_UQwMR1mz.Mzk6cOv9qUD1SQ0GMjli4l85pn.x.7J.ppypG6 25kt6m6SZvYnVHHhtkXQQjxvsC5TGAeSVBTVxrXM_h_FI_cmCsMcMPAdW53Wy8kMwX9bfVc5Un5x rVIRM_6BZlenEdT.Cq2whrAiAcPzXp8W6sbnL9ZEwuuv80rC5hQmLqGV.cZ7gDA4vLGka2_d6Ulf rVcIXFWaw_PKKE1K68KGgR.tL21eoKxoJa1VxaYCHIkO4XF4rPW4FC4Uv8_8DWfKl3htBgDzR5CB DnRJogGKqA.BRS967bYS.v0FMoG8RTfeWI0ihbVpRCMyqDEsmjmN48PhQCA7YWrIDnR9s9LuPORe adc7.Wi687pOponvrmUL5Nfv1HEjw5ojJFNSyAGgG_gA.Jk6oaXoZPg2CmY_DBNxGeO8OaZQOhO4 LEExT8185TLpBc4GwyXjQ5D3Pzc7cO49ZpPx6kvlkZfwcRiAiIcav1KVRIf5C8yqJOjtGW4LLEtk EKwugD90DxsOfm__BTeum35HOOAKCS91TlZCjk7I01wv.hnivAG7.TV6srDjgYy3fRPxGQ69byxk NV3qfAogoA8brkuMgjDoU3WHMI3P1EgvIbJtfMXGRbpcvk7Xc.8Mobma5CBc97eCW3MyIDDWTvRU JBb.fWVDR7Oot_f7VRc6qBlMknGNI5kfHQn6dzYARPsEAohgo1oLuxdgXzHKYRxXzu8KUEreB9yA 1xUcA4qtQkOGHBvcwLca6xL2pd1vTPdgW8aZUIUYTR7c763txb.fSQ2XQT9nJacXFjJ98J8PU6Y3 mKM3WPY464KnpbVISQ_X2XebjTEnx7ml5Sc0Fdt7OiNIj.CnLuLNiYEWpUbuceNiRjGud1tj4OPK h_76diGd0mCProhDGEWDjIeBH3yD5RDmJtL54HRl.v762xn.Udyq76EbsAFTFQJFT4hCEYI.OnVZ o10fx3Or9vYczmOGFDYExWvCUZVQzLWYmMewbHUQaVNuwVW6Fd7jZ_GHXtF308KT_8RJl42qlzhB _UoRMTr6N7mHJsQ2XzX3OBLbkvqEFHU1xF1Wtpl2bwPzmUilsirDk8HS9iU5acTGrRDIkePhUQZS SoUrmqKZH2NnS8qG6yjToq1nWyBdyL45PpNEwVMc4aoM4vpRZAZHt5I8DBh2f.wYTY6vGoDdkFcg mYwJ0uCQg9wfTxxQP6r_I.QHJIj0rWqqMNSP8hbJIXpNA0SwnDAuYCgAx6l5HPLVLSUrmnyNxfSX hD34CWiBoNoFBmQkWWxN5DSJBupuHQ89LNEc5gDxbKbzXmYbdfuUuy4yWHHLlqMu0SrLBggDbIUG Zs5Q8xzSVv6teFzuweeLl235AiIFJ5DSHEe4adktQcTCxd4.a4B0rUYyuxMLCicbSz1q5_bKjlcm GEs9KzvZxcExhbNqReR7nuMW.unWZ4lhKDejPeIrQ_NgglfFSWpRGnWIlPTKXGrpqkyg7gceBeLY IrXzUIBnfvQPQF5nCCGIMrvCvOZIN2L08Hl4i5Tbhyiwx69p0y.tAmKiLdK2G3K6cRme7aZ5KWsp SrVN4._0BbfzCNrZ6C1CGqWc_0TAdWY3jX1WclArgCy0yZ6.OAi2EEpuWqeI9lR.6k4Woqh5YVtl xjvlRYEGHvMXt6jpqzYo5Ei48LkFcVNuu5AarSUb4hc2YoM4r6eUWce9mYyJ2H3h69EAWU3WyKIT iYHO0Y8fP2XB2CKzwtxpMr.iJsTSTAW54TbeIQguzS9ttE2Q6dJVnZPiuZMI7aFzuH6O1_G.KJqM pjQmP5Ftm6fJ6ceHGxMEWQVfqLYCEY5EkKZvy8APppQQc0dNxrptIv6JXyrDUDPsutcodsipbbzW 2Kf2Md8motcxW5zcLYJhqy1N8bXu9E3LA_S5q2ypb4NyywLnHhs_AoJLBSVnDuWsbau8Ib9Kpog_ 1NFLW.HpvJ2wKWpsjNbg99vI1B5B9E2IU249pgbgSI3HF3JnT0Ze92wuLMRmAQklXGbQ8YYSqwSd 6N2vIj3G6JbMm4RRNeMGadFU1O8duskulVLJ6iK5Fpt0CQkYXX2zv6lUs.CVqA77Vyq_yl06U9zI rzzSvtWvRT3o_uj_U9w8iYCPbLwrcw7qdLgWZDhR6f2tAhf3oIszUsXyogce_EVFCzu.j5629uKo QgyLublpHuRfc7P7.aK8LK.aTuRbic.uliOItCEJWumeyMAQUJvM0ZxJBeXFl5bGQrQqcNQGRghj LTfhQjBe3xJRPltYi.ma.ZUi0ipp8d5ZBTsT9h8CzRGX5ajnuIzxLAxvdqoviJQRboqkMw_iTCN. 6chuvFQLbTuSe1fNyc6xsCzaHRGo6tt36Q5Hv5B.ifnoStyFSszpwPRApwaoT0NXDZWCieqRZ53C _aOcaRMTvwP5kMvWul5jiPfG1MkuT1TqfsQSJZ.tn4l7KJFz77TK5ufsVwTPK1O8qC64sxgyhWJw Rhl7iJ6XhyuzxIz7jIGSperKhQQ-- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:30:22 +0000 Received: by smtp416.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 4c7d38bfc64f9c92b83da69931e1a48c; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Subject: Re: When did pkg(8) drop support for 12-stable? From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:30:16 -0800 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Warner Losh Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1C347959-FDB2-42F7-97F5-F0A74078E7F2.ref@yahoo.com> <1C347959-FDB2-42F7-97F5-F0A74078E7F2@yahoo.com> To: Chris X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DlhJJ4ZL3z3hGr X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.50 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[98.137.65.148:from]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[98.137.65.148:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.65.148:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.65.148:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:30:25 -0000 On 2021-Feb-23, at 18:08, Chris wrote: > On 2021-02-23 17:42, Mark Millard wrote: >> (Warner is only CC'd here.) >> Warner Losh imp at bsdimp.com wrote on >> Wed Feb 24 01:04:13 UTC 2021 : >>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021, 4:51 PM Chris = wrote: >>> > Given this is a pkg(8) error, I brought it up on ports@ >>> > but it was suggested I (also?) bring it up here on stable@ >>> > >>> > OK awhile back I installed a copy of 12 stable from the >>> > usb stick image. I tweaked it to my wishes then got called >>> > away and haven't been able to get back to it until the other >>> > day. This is still a fresh install which has a populated /usr/src. >>> > So I >>> > svnlite co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports >>> > followed by a >>> > cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/ && make install clean >>> > which returns >>> > make >>> > /!\ ERROR: /!\ >>> > >>> > Ports Collection support for your FreeBSD version has ended, and = no ports >>> > are >>> > guaranteed to build on this syst >>> em. Please upgrade to a supported release. >>> > >>> > No support will be provided if you silence this message by = defining >>> > ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_SYSTEM. >>> > >>> > *** Error code 1 >>> > >>> > Stop. >>> > Err what? Ok while I think this was from stable 12.1, it's still = still 12, >>> > and it's on stable. So what gives? >>> > >>> 12.1 has reached EOL now that 12.2 has been out a while. >>> =46rom release/12.1.0/ : >> "Tag releng/12.1@r354233 as release/12.1.0 (12.1-RELEASE)" >> I think that implicit in Warner's response is that >> versions of stable/12/ that are not after r354233 are >> also EOL. One needs to have stable/12/ material from >> after -r354233 in order for it to be supported. >> He might even mean that stable/12/ material from before: >> "Tag releng/12.2@r366954 as release/12.2.0 (12.2-RELEASE)" >> would also be considered as not supported. >> To be safe you should be using stable/12/ material from >> on or after -r366954 in order to have a supported >> context. >> (I'm not sure if anything is explicit about the status >> of stable/12/ material between releng/12.1@r354233 >> and releng/12.2@r366954 .) > A HUGE thanks for all of this, Mark. This is EXACTLY what I needed. >=20 > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD fbsd12dev 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r363918 GENERIC = amd64 amd64 1201522 1201522 > which pretty well confirms what you deduced. > I'm still a bit confused. It seems to me that it didn't _used_ > to be that way. But my brain isn't using ECC. So a couple of > bits may be flipped. The implication of all of stable/12/ being supported would be support of stable/12/ from on or after its creation: QUOTE Revision 339434 - Directory Listing=20 Modified Fri Oct 19 00:09:24 2018 UTC (2 years, 4 months ago) by gjb=20 Copied from: head revision 339432 Copy head@r339432 to stable/12 as part of the 12.0-RELEASE cycle. Additional post-branch commits will follow. END QUOTE Such does not seem likely to me. What would be the point of dropping 12.0-RELEASE support and 12.1-RELEASE support if such stable/12/ history was covered, some of that history being minor variations on the 12.0-RELEASE or 12.1-RELEASE ? Note: Despite some claims in other messages, svn -r363918 is not 12.1-RELEASE ( not -r354233 ) and -r363918 is shown as (only) in stable/12/ by svn. Your claim of 12-STABLE was correct, just not detailed enough. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)