From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Aug 22 19:22:10 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [216.33.66.196])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5302F37B40C; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 13ECE81D06; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:21:58 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:21:58 -0500
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To: Dave Zarzycki <zarzycki@freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current
Message-ID: <20010822212158.X81307@elvis.mu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108221713240.16888-200000@bonk.apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108221713240.16888-200000@bonk.apple.com>; from zarzycki@freebsd.org on Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:15:18PM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

* Dave Zarzycki <zarzycki@freebsd.org> [010822 19:23] wrote:
> Attached and tested.
> 
> I'd like to merge this in unless anybody objects.

I don't object, I'm just wondering if you know could discuss
the implementation here versus the other ones avaiable at:

http://www.psc.edu/networking/all_sack.html

About the strength/weaknesses of those methods versus this one.

The one developed at PSC looks like the most advanced one.

Is this work derived from any of those?

-Alfred

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message