Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:38:36 -0800 (PST) From: Steve Wingate <s.wingate@pobox.com> To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> Cc: Steve Wingate <s.wingate@pobox.com> Subject: Re: Dualbooting STABLE & CURRENT Message-ID: <20031101203741.S621@daemon.g-e-e-k.net> In-Reply-To: <20031101202118.Q70057@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20031101131821.U253@daemon.g-e-e-k.net> <20031101161947.M70057@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031101202118.Q70057@carver.gumbysoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I don't like the sound of that. I'll just stick with STABLE until 5.x is > > really ready. > > -STABLE will have the same problem since its in boot0 and the BIOS, not > the OS on the partition its trying to boot. Actually STABLE will have no problems as it's been running on this box for over a year. +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Steve Wingate <s_dot_wingate@pobox.com> |MCSE, CCNA Sat Nov 1 20:30:00 PST 2003 +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ |FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE | 8:30PM up 2 days, 12:37, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031101203741.S621>