From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 30 19:41:31 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8417D9
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
 [188.252.31.196])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB9A8FC0A
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:41:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBUJfLRh005484;
 Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:41:21 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
 by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qBUJfKcd005477;
 Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:41:21 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:41:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Quentin SCHWERKOLT <develloper.unix@hotmail.fr>
Subject: RE: UFS1 vs UFS2
In-Reply-To: <BAY002-W211AF4BA0884C546AE231E6843D0@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212302040590.4966@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <BAY002-W211AF4BA0884C546AE231E6843D0@phx.gbl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:41:22 +0100 (CET)
Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:41:31 -0000

i chose with newfs as i don't use installer :)

anyway - it is not an answer to the question.

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Quentin SCHWERKOLT wrote:

> Since FreeBSD 9.0, you can choose between UFS1 and UFS2 in bsdinstall(8) when creating a new freebsd-ufs partition.
>
> Q. Schwerkolt
>
>> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100
>> From: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
>> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
>> Subject: UFS1 vs UFS2
>>
>> OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB.
>>
>> FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes.
>> basic operation seems the same.
>>
>> Does it make sense to use UFS1 for small filesystem (on SSD) that would
>> have few millions of files. It will take less space for inodes, but how
>> about performance?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>