From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon May 27 10:50:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA28667
          for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 27 May 1996 10:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA28661;
          Mon, 27 May 1996 10:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by ki.net (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id NAA11983; Mon, 27 May 1996 13:50:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 13:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org>, fredriks@mcs.com,
        freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: i386/631 
In-Reply-To: <96May27.094518pdt.177475@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.960527134924.11708F-100000@ki.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 27 May 1996, Bill Fenner wrote:

> In message <199605262339.QAA11265@freefall.freebsd.org> you write:
> >Synopsis: if_ix does not support bpf, nor does it appear to support MC.
> 
> Nobody appears to know how to put this card into promiscuous mode, nor
> how to configure its multicast filters.  I tried to argued that bpf is
> useful without promiscuous mode, but was overruled.
>
	Can we close it then?  Its been there for almost a year now...
if someone *really* misses it, they can always submit a new PR...?

Marc G. Fournier                                  scrappy@ki.net
Systems Administrator @ ki.net               scrappy@freebsd.org