From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 28 20:36:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AC21065676; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from skip@menantico.com) Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4AA8FC16; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.menantico.com ([71.188.7.134]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KP3008A9T7Y12J1@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net>; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:36:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:39:13 -0400 From: Skip Ford To: Doug Barton Message-id: <20090828203913.GA971@menantico.com> References: <4A92F00E.1040705@FreeBSD.org> <20090825100052.9d963401.matheus@eternamente.info> <20090825185513.GA1046@menantico.com> <4A94651B.1030501@FreeBSD.org> <20090826025041.GA975@menantico.com> <4A959417.9000208@FreeBSD.org> <20090827223216.GA969@menantico.com> <4A9811D1.5020203@FreeBSD.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <4A9811D1.5020203@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Nenhum_de_Nos Subject: Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:36:09 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Skip Ford wrote: > > > So, basically, portmaster stopped and asked for input because it thought I > > might've forgotten that I installed an +IGNOREME file 10 minutes prior. > > I'd prefer to not have tools that try to "think" about what I'm doing. > > It should do what I say it should do, not what it thinks I may have meant. > > Certainly, enough information was provided by me for portmaster to DTRT > > without causing any harm whatsoever if it didn't request input. > > You obviously have very strong opinions about how you think portmaster > should operate, I wouldn't say that at all. I honestly haven't put any thought into it. I'm saying, that I used the tool and expected it to operate, with regard to +IGNOREME files, in the same way that all of the package tools and portupgrade (IIRC) have worked for the years I've been using the system. It didn't, and it caught me off-guard. That's just my review of using your code to upgrade a machine, not some strongly-held belief. At least now we know why it didn't, because it was worried about me possibly forgetting someday that I'd installed an +IGNOREME file. Frankly, that's none of it's business if my memory's failing. :) I think it should do what I tell it to do like the other tools have over the years. But whatever. I can change the code if I want. -- Skip