Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 05:15:14 -0400 From: Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> To: Jon Radel <jon@radel.com>, "Kevin P. Neal" <kpn@neutralgood.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sh[it] and What am I missing here? Message-ID: <e1b02ae3-5d14-045b-645c-77e074465222@columbus.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <867DA569-6F10-4636-BE60-A3E7A844C7E8@radel.com> References: <31b2cfb1-1da8-9262-3f03-d964776c905e@columbus.rr.com> <575453F9.9070508@holgerdanske.com> <4daed7a2-9a0b-15d9-0bb2-31227f8fcddd@columbus.rr.com> <5754641A.8010508@gmail.com> <5fd48d4e-0ca9-681b-83af-da18280f4979@columbus.rr.com> <20160606022031.GA35165@neutralgood.org> <867DA569-6F10-4636-BE60-A3E7A844C7E8@radel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/05/16 23:34, Jon Radel wrote: >>> It does need the suffix .sh because if it is missing I fail to >>> function...... the computer does just fine. >> No, if this is the case you are doing something weird. The filename does >> not matter, and the extension is just part of that filename. >> >> > Perhaps you should read what he wrote again? He's already agreed that FreeBSD doesn't need the extension. It's more a personal problem--I can only surmise he confuses himself less when he labels his files with hints as to their type. > > :-/ > > --Jon Radel Yep you got it....When I see .sh I know it's a shell script
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e1b02ae3-5d14-045b-645c-77e074465222>