From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 1 15:01:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F601065675 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw) Received: from FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw (FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw [140.113.17.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26C98FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw) Received: by FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1058) id 4C28F61DDB; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:42:02 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:42:02 +0800 From: Li-Wen Hsu To: Andrew MacIntyre Message-ID: <20090701144202.GA78637@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> References: <1e39c0a90906301349m5e6035acxb5098924d0aea90f@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B5D2A.8060208@bullseye.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <4A4B5D2A.8060208@bullseye.apana.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] lang/python30 (and lang/python*) fixes X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:01:57 -0000 On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 22:57:14 +1000, Andrew MacIntyre wrote: > Given the experimental nature of Python 3.0, and the fact that 3.1 is=20 > out, it seems to me that Python 3.0's time in the ports collection > should not be extended. Yes. But as long as we do not set Python 3.0 as the default Python version, I thought there is no harm keeping 3.0 in the ports tree. However, is there any need for keeping python 2.3, or even 2.4 in the ports tree? --=20 Li-Wen Hsu http://lwhsu.org