Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:41:29 +0400
From:      "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Alexey Dokuchaev" <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/games/ppracer Makefile pkg-descr
Message-ID:  <cb5206420706150841q2ad43ffcibe1089658f77237f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070615143248.GA48867@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200706151319.l5FDJ3ZT002340@repoman.freebsd.org> <cb5206420706150625h1554d0blabda24b04f50a626@mail.gmail.com> <20070615143248.GA48867@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:25:56PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > On 6/15/07, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >danfe       2007-06-15 13:19:03 UTC
> > >
> > >  FreeBSD ports repository
> > >
> > >  Modified files:
> > >    games/ppracer        Makefile pkg-descr
> > >  Log:
> > >  - Fix the build with latest GCC [1]
> > >  - Improve on COMMENT and port description
> > >  - Utilize USE_DOS2UNIX
> > >  - Clean up Makefile
> > >
> > >  Reported by:    pointyhat [1]
> >
> > Please give credit to the actual human being, e.g
> > "pointyhat via kris" or "pointyhat via pav". If you
> > examined the logs yourself than "portsmon" should
> > be appropriate.

On 6/15/07, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote:
> What if he read the log directly on pointyhat website?
>
> I don't mind contribution missing here - the main thing is that the
> breakage gets fixed.

On 6/15/07, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Fair enough.  FWIW, yes, I always put "via" part if I find errorlog in
> my inbox.  Lack of such attribution indicates that I was just grepping
> through logs myself.  It is especially true since right now I'm fixing
> unmaintained ports.

Right, I'm sorry I doubted you. I'll propose "pointyhat logs"
value to avoid ambiguity, but this can be discussed
separately.

Of course, this is not as much a vanity issue, as a proper
documentation practice.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420706150841q2ad43ffcibe1089658f77237f>