From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Mon Dec 19 19:05:08 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3149EC88E33
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:05:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from alarig@swordarmor.fr)
Received: from kaiminus.swordarmor.fr (kaiminus.swordarmor.fr
 [IPv6:2a00:5884:8200:15::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4B4170B
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from alarig@swordarmor.fr)
Received: from kaiminus (localhost [IPv6:::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by kaiminus.swordarmor.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55C55892C5;
 Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:05:06 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swordarmor.fr;
 s=default; t=1482174306;
 bh=RnZAqR8Ved6EcCXWFo9movBa87AcSXpxDV3KNu80+eI=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
 b=JbI3KSK67KPpSGKwJpHh0cQhpQw4AhBqXvL/ZbcBvV9uEbxSwIJ35Gp0M7VBN1p7i
 mblsyBxzhzSYQUwD5sV8OW5xjdiDpPE8otmE7lrNW7yU5ylayHXTFM3sQxKyduscQw
 vLNUk6vcfm4GpZLpS3YGCw9QuWXw/OYuzBHPY/o4=
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:05:06 +0100
From: Alarig Le Lay <alarig@swordarmor.fr>
To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Avoid using RFC3927 outside of the link
Message-ID: <20161219190506.kc32q7sz3okekup7@kaiminus>
References: <20161219184617.7yph7isgtgjy4mja@kaiminus>
 <58582C25.7090806@grosbein.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6ct6f4om2wlyn7hs"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <58582C25.7090806@grosbein.net>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161104 (1.7.1)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:05:08 -0000


--6ct6f4om2wlyn7hs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue Dec 20 01:51:17 2016, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 20.12.2016 1:46, Alarig Le Lay =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
>=20
> > Is it possible to avoid this behaviour and reply with the public IP
> > (89.234.186.1) instead?
>=20
> try: sysctl net.inet.icmp.reply_from_interface=3D1

If an AS choose to go to us thought this peer, packets will come in by
this interface, so our router will continue to reply with the apipa IP
for those ASes.

--=20
alarig

--6ct6f4om2wlyn7hs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYWC9fAAoJEK84SsFrICuIgrUH+QFXEzYiTFbdvPB0eUAxV7TE
X0Bn5r7z9rwn0kzH7f7VesuAiApaPOHz+ifrWBeC1S+KfKYntc8QmXGliZWaxj+g
y73vGI2Ri1sCE9V35noe5okxyshWC8yWNk7WSD7jkILTaTyV/udSQ92vXaqal6Ky
czIDxLpy8W2al57HzKAxvWpWdblrRZMmE6FxkQffW1f4rUpxmbeuVPiLQRsvebgd
fksRSaVzkeHmV1ktBkm7DWXqu+VYvUbV/jHcbNn6TlG5V2KxlOlvHJPZkTTfGkCB
+QICEVQcbFVad2R7WktsrWC6vTBW9b493+jwqupUqUP3QBfj79AlcLmsKNrio54=
=68BS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6ct6f4om2wlyn7hs--