Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:50:07 GMT From: "Jeffrey H. Johnson" <CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/92658: [PATCH] sysutils/heirloom: [Unbreak AMD64 build] Message-ID: <200602012250.k11Mo7w1026196@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/92658; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Jeffrey H. Johnson" <CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, mnag@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org,
ports-amd64@FreeBSD.org, CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: ports/92658: [PATCH] sysutils/heirloom: [Unbreak AMD64 build]
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:41:58 -0500
OK, I have an update here:
-----------------------------------
--- spell/spellin.c.orig Wed Feb 1 23:34:58 2006
+++ spell/spellin.c Wed Feb 1 23:27:02 2006
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
z = huff((1L<<HASHWIDTH)/atof(argv[1]));
fprintf(stderr, "%s: expected code widths = %f\n",
argv[0], z);
- for (count = 0; scanf("%lo", (long *)&h) == 1; ++count) {
+ for (count = 0; scanf("%o", (long *)&h) == 1; ++count) {
if ((t = h >> (HASHWIDTH - INDEXWIDTH)) != u) {
if (bp != B)
wp++;
-----------------------------------
This should work on all architectures where int32_t is the same size
as int, which I *believe* should cover all current FreeBSD platforms.
If someone has a better solution, I'd be glad to hear it. I'm also
puzzled as to why this seems to work on pointyhat without the
modifications but I don't have access to AMD64 running 5 to examine.
If someone who knows what they are doing can apply a more proper fix,
please do. :p
--
Jeffrey H. Johnson
CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602012250.k11Mo7w1026196>