From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 20 21:11:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6376216A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:11:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C766143D45 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 46640 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2005 20:53:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Jan 2005 20:53:19 -0000 Message-ID: <41F01E6E.ACF548A@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:11:10 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Silbersack References: <6.1.1.1.2.20050110103857.045a9a68@81.255.84.73> <20050116191002.W7264@odysseus.silby.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Len Conrad cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Lars Erik Gullerud Subject: Re: buildup of Windows time_wait talking to fbsd 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:11:13 -0000 Mike Silbersack wrote: > > FWIW, when doing some benchmarking of apache vs thttpd a long while ago, I > found results similar to Lars. When I used one program for benchmarking, > the TIME_WAIT sockets would build up on the client side. When I used > another program, the TIME_WAIT sockets built up on the server-side, and > were subsequently recycled. This depends on the side that closes the TCP connection first. It goes either way. -- Andre