From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Jun 10 19:37:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A40CAEE059; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3829F2AF4; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from anthias (vie-91-186-158-235.dsl.sil.at [91.186.158.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85B4F3F450; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:37:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r416661 - in head/lang: . gcc6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201606100904.u5A94Fuq018242@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:37:24 -0000 On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > Hello Gerald, > > I got Q/A message as follows: Interesting. That should not be different from lang/gcc6-devel, which we've had for quite a while. Did you see it there as well? > Error: /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libcilkrts.so.5.0.0 is linked to > /usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.6 from misc/compat9x but it is not > declared as a dependency Nothing in lang/gcc6 should use anything from /usr/local/lib/compat/, and definitely not libstdc++.so.*. Shouldn't ports generally be built without misc/compat*? Gerald