From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 08:11:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3D016A4CE for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:11:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from sarevok.webteckies.org (node123e0.a2000.nl [24.132.35.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D756E43D53 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:11:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mdev@sarevok.webteckies.org) Received: by sarevok.webteckies.org (Postfix, from userid 100) id D31D4B82A; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:11:35 +0100 (CET) From: Melvyn Sopacua Organization: WebTeckies.org To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:11:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <20040131150221.GA24039@trefle.ens.fr> In-Reply-To: <20040131150221.GA24039@trefle.ens.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_3O9GA+dajumn37V"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401311711.35680.freebsd-questions@webteckies.org> Subject: Re: NFS performances on 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:11:38 -0000 --Boundary-02=_3O9GA+dajumn37V Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 31 January 2004 16:02, Jacques Beigbeder wrote: > time dd=3D/fileserver/aFile of=3D/fileserver/otherFile bs=3D32768 > > NFS client time # pkts > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Solaris 3.11s 2296 > Linux Redhat9 2.42s 1929 > FreeBSD 5.1 19.72s 14887 FreeBSD 4.9 3.04s 6380 > FreeBSD 5.2 2.98s 5941 > > All FreeBSD uses: mount_nfs -U -3 -r 32768 -w 32768 ... > > Question: is there any tuning on 5.1 to get better performances? Did you read the notes in src/UPDATING saying: NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 5.x IS SLOW: =2D-=20 Melvyn =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =46reeBSD sarevok.webteckies.org 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Wed Ja= n 28=20 18:01:18 CET 2004 =20 root@sarevok.lan.webteckies.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAREVOK_NOAPM_NODEBUG = =20 i386 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --Boundary-02=_3O9GA+dajumn37V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAG9O3Ov9JNmfFN5URAtVNAJ9luLC+IQQasNShCOQGEO9VuuFggwCePac2 lJczVR+XwfS8LcxbPUFbGFo= =syQC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_3O9GA+dajumn37V--