From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 26 21:01:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD88A1065686 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 21:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yr.retarded@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f183.google.com (mail-pz0-f183.google.com [209.85.222.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13038FC36 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 21:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk13 with SMTP id 13so5189284pzk.13 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:01:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=crlaGvNOQEk2K0QGpJVKuS8Yz4HYm5Re7MRwn6JXwq8=; b=pSl16scxadg3UpfmqjG3NJBSOzA9vBo3eOHjXD9Kyadrk8FGg4teIlTh36LJSVXQ+9 nFtBPK+D3y7hslknvRwMonHNWYexbckg/uJ338X9T8h84xTKNsTzFZkfzDYA4OfiW4nM lco+0W4MS4klcLx8bqV8jlEjQzYkuhLY+yrEc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bgQ/CVNQh2pefVGIfuW2Iv/CsWPeX8NlZQz+gz5EH5BZ8vjFqdjQyPNzoiKZ6VCsO7 lAAkypmSXWQu1JzLtr/CliF9uMlmLS709r4vrAcz+YwduImyNd8gNH/v1VugRm7ZUAHD QUaS4daTuqV1ohRxjueHAvnRyoy05cwWlrb7A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.27.3 with SMTP id e3mr6347400wfj.224.1274907716715; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.49.1 with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:01:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7DB9656A-44DF-4A37-B9A4-652451234FEE@lassitu.de> References: <7DB9656A-44DF-4A37-B9A4-652451234FEE@lassitu.de> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:01:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Chris Ruiz Cc: freebsd-current Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: AppleTalk status X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 21:01:57 -0000 On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that c= omes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk s= upport is in these days. =A0Is anybody still using it, or would now be the = time to make all AppleTalk support in that port optional, and just focus on= the file server component? > > I haven't used AppleTalk for at least eight years now, and I don't quite = see which setting it still would be used in nowadays... Snow Leopard (10.6) dropped support for AppleTalk, so I think that making it compile-time optional would be the best way to go. Just my 2c. Thanks -- Chris ----------------------------------------- http://twitter.com/chrisattack http://chrisattack.com