Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:55:41 GMT From: Sangwoo Shim <sangwoos@gmail.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/91711: Shouldn't ports/x11-toolkit/freeglut get moved to ports/graphics? Message-ID: <200601121555.k0CFtf3h057089@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200601121600.k0CG0KRv009000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 91711
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: Shouldn't ports/x11-toolkit/freeglut get moved to ports/graphics?
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Thu Jan 12 16:00:19 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Sangwoo Shim
>Release: FreeBSD 7-CURRENT
>Organization:
Seoul Natl' Univ.
>Environment:
FreeBSD ssw.dyndns.org 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Dec 22 04:15:40 KST 2005 root@ssw.dyndns.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SSW amd64
>Description:
As far as I know, both graphics/libglut and x11-toolkit/freeglut give same
API (library). Then why should they lie in the different categories?
I think freeglut should be moved to ports/graphics also, and marked as
conflict against graphics/libglut to avoid confusions.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601121555.k0CFtf3h057089>