From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 12 01:13:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1301C37B437; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out004.verizon.net (out004pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0911C43F85; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:13:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@pcmedx.com) Received: from duron.pcmedx.com ([4.46.1.67]) by out004.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030712081308.KQEE14849.out004.verizon.net@duron.pcmedx.com>; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 03:13:08 -0500 Received: from mike (mike.pcmedx.com [192.168.240.249]) by duron.pcmedx.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B6907AA14; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <008201c3484d$6c817150$f9f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> From: "Mike Maltese" To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" References: <000e01c34830$6e543bb0$f9f0a8c0@pcmedx.com><20030712045247.GL24420@wantadilla.lemis.com><001b01c34835$6cc93ca0$f9f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> <20030712074329.GO24420@wantadilla.lemis.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:13:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out004.verizon.net from [4.46.1.67] at Sat, 12 Jul 2003 03:13:08 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum and hot-swapping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:13:10 -0000 >The real performance penalty for RAID-5 is simply that writes require >so much I/O. Expect 25% of the write performance of RAID-0. I'm was aware of the performance penalties that go along with RAID-5, but I was under the impression that calculating the parity data put quite a load on the CPU, so this is good news indeed. Thanks for your help!! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" To: "Mike Maltese" Cc: Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 12:43 AM Subject: Re: vinum and hot-swapping