From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Apr  8 22:30:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA09131
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 22:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA09124
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 22:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA05609; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 22:27:53 -0700
Message-Id: <199604090527.WAA05609@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: roell@blah.a.isar.de, hackers@FreeBSD.org, roell@xinside.com
Subject: Re: The F_SETOWN problem.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Apr 1996 15:10:32 PDT."
             <199604082210.PAA03116@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 22:27:52 -0700
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> Terry Lambert said:

 > If the events still queued to process quantum, that would be a
 > different matter, but then what about user space reentry, specifically
 > AST stacks when multiple AST's fire before a single AST can finish
 > processing?
 > 
 > 

Yeah, what about it ??

	Amancio