From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 2 12:25:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6382637B422 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 12:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA21365; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:23:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:23:54 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: John Galt Cc: Mike Meyer , rob , Johannes Zwart , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not XEmacs, after all? Message-ID: <20000902142354.A20066@dan.emsphone.com> References: <14767.55635.361083.677034@guru.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.8i In-Reply-To: ; from "John Galt" on Sat Sep 2 13:20:42 GMT 2000 X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Sep 02), John Galt said: > But lynx is deprecated--I had to compile it from source on my 4.0 > machine (but I also got the added benefit of getting the bleeding > edge features this way...) Lynx is not deprecated. w3m certainly doesn't compete with it in terms of features or ease of use yet. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message