From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 30 00:37:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0419216A4CE for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:37:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (fast.dnswatch.com [216.177.243.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A6243D48 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:37:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (localhost.dnswatch.com [127.0.0.1]) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j3U0aurt020209; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:36:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id j3U0auZG020208; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:36:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fast.dnswatch.com: www set sender to null@dnswatch.com using -f Received: from ns0.1command.com ([216.177.243.38]) (DNSwatch.com_WebMail authenticated user null) by webmail.dnswatch.com with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1366.216.177.243.38.1114821415.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> In-Reply-To: <200504292121.j3TLLG4W010628@realtime.exit.com> References: <200504292121.j3TLLG4W010628@realtime.exit.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:36:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "/dev/null" To: frank@exit.com User-Agent: DNSwatch.com_WebMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot banner project X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:37:03 -0000 > You know, all this chatter is moot without code. Those of you who feel > so strongly about this, go and write your interface. Then let the best > one take over the world. > > Until then, you're just debating the color of a bikeshed that you'll > never get around to actually building. (Which is why I haven't taken > part, This would be the second time you haven't "taken part". If memory serves me correctly. -Chris H. > that and I really couldn't care less about this particular subject; the > current installation interface is just fine as far as I'm concerned.) > -- > Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ > Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ > http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/ > //////////////////////////////////////////////////// If only Western Electric had found a way to offer binary licenses for the UNIX system back in 1974, the UNIX system would be running on all PC's today rather than DOS/Windows. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////