Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 11:42:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210820] lang/python27: _ssl.so fails to build (Undefined symbol "SSLv2_method") Message-ID: <bug-210820-21822-LcQtQq9DJM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210820-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210820-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210820 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback?(python |maintainer-feedback+, |@FreeBSD.org) |maintainer-feedback?(portmg | |r@FreeBSD.org) Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People CC| |python@FreeBSD.org Assignee|python@FreeBSD.org |portmgr@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |patch Priority|--- |Normal --- Comment #13 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Fukang Chen from comment #10) Escalating to portmgr@ (see below) @portmgr please advise if/what workarounds might be available to python@ to resolve the issue in lang/python* ports until the root cause can be fixed permanently. @Fukang, can you include that test matrix (pastebin) as an attachment so it doesn't get lost (or missed) please. Notes: The CFLAGS modification workaround is not a root-cause fix, as it doesn't resolve the expected/actual runtime library discrepancy (uses base, not por= ts). To be clear, it appears thus far from the evidence provided, that this is t= he result of a conflict caused by the interaction between framework ncurses/ssl bits, relating to base vs ports rpath arguments, exposed by the move from Mk/bsd.foo.mk to Uses/foo.mk. It also appears that this is not strictly, or= in principle limited to python, nor ssl and ncurses only, but has a much wider potential for impact. Q: What other existing base vs ports cases could highlight the same issue? Q: Does swapping ssl/ncurses in USES not just reverse the problem in the ca= se of base ssl and ports ncurses? If not, why not? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210820-21822-LcQtQq9DJM>