From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org  Mon Aug 13 11:04:08 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD2A106EB7E
 for <freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:04:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es)
Received: from cu01176b.smtpx.saremail.com (cu01176b.smtpx.saremail.com
 [195.16.151.151])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F431747F1
 for <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:04:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es)
Received: from [172.16.8.58] (unknown [192.148.167.11])
 by proxypop01.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 276B89DC6D6;
 Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:03:57 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: ZFS backup Q: send/recv and mountpoint property
From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es>
In-Reply-To: <BE8539E1-351B-4C77-8A34-FE6CE665AA40@sarenet.es>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:03:56 +0200
Cc: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>,
 freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C5928825-5CA7-44DB-A62F-3F97C6FC61C8@sarenet.es>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1807222110450.28320@woozle.rinet.ru>
 <BE8539E1-351B-4C77-8A34-FE6CE665AA40@sarenet.es>
To: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:04:08 -0000



> On 13 Aug 2018, at 11:47, Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> wrote:
> Otherwise, unless you have atime=3Doff any read access will change the =
last access
> timestamps, which means that incremental snapshots won=E2=80=99t apply =
unless you force
> a rollback with a -N. Using -N is itself a bad idea because, in case =
of error, you might
> end up rolling back something you don=E2=80=99t want. If you avoid the =
rollback you will
> avoid making the recv destructive in any way.

I mean -F of course, not -N. Thanks to the attentive readers who poked =
me! :P





Borja.