From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 20 11:50:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D31A16A412 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F84743D55 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:50:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from Unsupported (thebrick.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.30]) by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6/Kp) with ESMTP id k9KBoCgT095641; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:50:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:50:33 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Kostik Belousov Message-ID: <82C14B40C9061504218D7585@Unsupported> In-Reply-To: <20061020110151.GU55428@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20061020110151.GU55428@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.4 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-STABLE hangs, ddb shows 'acpi_timer_read'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:50:25 -0000 --On 20 October 2006 14:01 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:56:33AM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote: >> >> I have a crash dump from it - which I've saved (I'm moderately familiar >> with working with dumps, but this one is split into two?) >> >> If anyone has any pointers, or can do some hand holding to get more info >> from the dump, or what to do next time it happens? > > See > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kern > eldebug-deadlocks.html Thanks for the link! Anyone know much is all that lot (such as INVARIANTS/WITNESS) etc. likely to slow the machine down? - A few percent? More? I'm just a little hesitant to put it all in, and end up with a machine that's 80% slower :( -Karl