From owner-freebsd-small Wed Nov 8 2:17:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from aardvark.ie (NW195-200.indigo.ie [194.125.195.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC9D237B479 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 02:17:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 9907 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2000 10:17:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nw195.aardvark.ie) (194.125.195.94) by -R with SMTP; 8 Nov 2000 10:17:39 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001108101652.038867b0@mx1> X-Sender: jerry@mx1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 10:17:35 +0000 To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org From: Jerry Walsh Subject: Re: unsubscribing In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001107140919.00e0eef0@mail.flashcom.net> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001101093158.00a70dc0@mx1> <611C3E2A972ED41196EF0050DA92E07608F9B2@EXCHANGE2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 14:16 07/11/00 -0800, Tim O'Neil wrote: >At 01:32 AM 11/1/00, you wrote: >>Is it *REALLY* all that hard to read the last two lines appended to every >>message that goes through this list? > >I think it really is. Every mail list I subscribe to >gets about two to four commands sent to the list >rather than the list server each day. Granted, not >all of them have precise commands on how to un-subscribe >from said list, but I have to wonder; if they can't >figure out how to un-subscribe, how did they subscribe >in the first place? Must be the buckshot approach to >Murphy's Law or summat... > >-Tim >=========================== >Geek Code, v.7.777: +++0+++; >Shoutout to fil, kreet0n, & Beth, >the chicken is in the pot, repeat, >the chicken is in the pot... >rinse, repeat. > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message ^ Looky here, a precise command on how to unsubscribe.. well holy smokes! J. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message