From owner-freebsd-small Wed Oct 7 13:37:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA16695 for freebsd-small-outgoing; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 13:37:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA16639 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 13:37:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from diabolique ([195.121.59.122]) by smtp02.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with SMTP id AAC104E; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 22:37:11 +0200 X-Sender: skywise@pop.wxs.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Demo Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 22:38:42 +0200 To: "Christopher G. Petrilli" From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Subject: Re: Command-line i/f Cc: FreeBSD Small In-Reply-To: <19981007133938.13295@amber.org> References: <82k92c2v81.fsf@chimp.juniper.net> <199810051532.LAA10779@jhicks.glenatl.glenayre.com> <361B7B87.CE5B9D96@intercom.com> <82k92c2v81.fsf@chimp.juniper.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <771898F0E7A.AAC104E@smtp02.wxs.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 19:39 07-10-98 , Christopher G. Petrilli wrote: >On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 09:27:26AM -0700, Tony Li wrote: >> jason@intercom.com (Jason J. Horton) writes: >> >> > Quick question. Has support been added to the standard router distrib >> > to handle T1, Frame Relay, E1, FDDI, ATM and HSSI cards? >> >> There are working T1, HSSI and FDDI cards today. [SDL, SDL, and DEC, >> respectively] The ATM card is almost there today, but has some problems. I >> know of no useful E1 or Frame Relay implementations out there. > >Since this is up your alley Tony :-) Is anyone working on >IP-over-SONET? I have a few customers who would like to use this for >some applications of connecting high-speed servers to BFRs. Let's draw up a list of protocols which are being requested/used a lot and not a lot and let's try to see how we can implement most of them on short term and others on long term, I for one would be happy to dedicate a lot of time to get those protocols back up to CURRENT and RELEASE/STABLE. I hope others might want to help out too? Because I see this as THE point in which picoBSD may be stronger than 'competitors'. That's all my opinion though, and everyone on this list knows by know that I am protocol/routing mad and love disks =) *chuckles* Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / Asmodai ICQ-UIN: 1564317 .:. Ninth Circle Enterprises Network/Security Specialist /==|| FreeBSD and picoBSD, the Power to Serve ||==\ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message