Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:50:39 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Tim Gustafson <tjg@ucsc.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Excluding File Systems from 100.chksetuid and 110.neggrpperm Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK209YqTu8B-eH4k=-LgZ6wugkzRjGFNfPCu_on49wwzGw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPyBAS7WN91CCxB15xpf_C7XEdv9T=DG-W7GjTx0Vy7s5Fx9gQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyBAS7WN91CCxB15xpf_C7XEdv9T=DG-W7GjTx0Vy7s5Fx9gQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Tim Gustafson <tjg@ucsc.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > We have several FreeBSD 10.x and 11.x servers that host about 150TB of > ZFS file systems each. > > Each day, the 100.chksetuid and 110.neggrpperm run against our entire > data set, which has hundreds of millions of files in it, and winds up > slowing everything down and using up all our resources. > > Looking at those scripts, they don't seem to take any parameters, and > I can't configure them to exclude certain folders that really just > don't need to be scanned. I did find this post which suggested a > patch for FreeBSD 9.x, but it does not appear to have even been > implemented: > > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/31846/ > > Is there any hope of getting these options added? > That thread mentions this posting which contains responses as to why it likely was never pursued further: https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=275969+0+/usr/local/www/mailindex/archive/2012/freebsd-stable/20120506.freebsd-stable -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK209YqTu8B-eH4k=-LgZ6wugkzRjGFNfPCu_on49wwzGw>