From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 9 17: 6:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CAB1507A for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 17:06:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA27828; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 17:04:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdW27825; Wed Mar 10 01:04:11 1999 Message-ID: <36E5C507.7DE14518@whistle.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 17:04:07 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Matthew Dillon , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: An Update on- 'Panic in FFS/4.0 as of yesterday - update' References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Jacob wrote: > > I've taken a kernel source as of of today, added your patches on top, used > a CCD to build a 120GB disk partition (2 raid units), and have resumed > testing with my stuff again. > > If that all passes reasonably well (so far so good- 32 processes, each > writing 2GB files- getting a range of 15-25MB/s on the CCD)- what's the > likelihood of getting it checked in? > > -matt pretty good.. committers have been flooded but this hasn't been forgotten.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message