Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 09:02:54 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> Cc: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org>, "Hurling, Rainer" <rhurlin@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase Message-ID: <BF328CA3-A975-44D3-9A60-D597E39CC8BA@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <644c3cfe-6135-4e26-9043-602a10ce041a@madpilot.net> References: <CAFDf7UL6icbdu5705GFhvy3Lx5Qf4mAO9LkLp3nS=i8CMOZmBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFDf7U%2B76qtxaQZsLbS6ppg39=GofXLncnRB_MxJREe0NMuJwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFDf7U%2BGmUucAgq0y_ukRrWeJ5gW6Sb4pas55hEpyD36WLUwKw@mail.gmail.com> <68bbf05d-1d4a-4819-bb83-be6c4f002a63@gwdg.de> <CAFDf7UJ14XS7oAVjo1pcj_fqTx=PQZd3P=nQLVBkbzD0nU8X8w@mail.gmail.com> <7fb64cac-9b09-4235-9235-2bfb6c228442@gwdg.de> <CAFDf7UKT4DqT1i9aQxcM3X3bYkHVbGTxwvXxn_Lg5jNXYoOVHQ@mail.gmail.com> <4de598b1-a576-4ac6-949c-63d1065d818d@madpilot.net> <iqazj5j5pjg3kws54y3xpt72frcaslexxvzqdacsrgpt6ftemy@vvqhzxhg7oxn> <lvhulcaznwjrfnchozithatlvc5a2otkpdrlee4gvrua2qwda2@ufumkjdfzkdk> <r64nqrgxikqq6atzpzylbyfgrgrkz2bevl2tblpqjdilqkksuw@6vmkldhsi42u> <644c3cfe-6135-4e26-9043-602a10ce041a@madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 1 f=C3=A9vrier 2025 23:36:12 GMT+01:00, Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot=2Enet>= a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >On 01/02/25 22:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: >>>>> On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote: >>>>>> Hello Rainer, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After al= l, he has >>>>>> > worked intensively on the pkg updates=2E >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Yes it is=2E I'm CC'ing bapt@=2E >>>>>=20 >>>>> Since this issue was pestering me while testing multiple ports with >>>>> unnecessarily lengthy rebuilds I took a look=2E >>>>>=20 >>>>> I have posted a pull request for poudriere [1] with a fix/workaround= that >>>>> works for me and allows me to have a functional build machine=2E >>>>>=20 >>>>> I'm not sure if this fix is completely correct, but maybe it can be = useful >>>>> to other people as a work around=2E >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> [1] https://github=2Ecom/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204 >>>>>=20 >>>>> --=20 >>>>> Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot=2Enet> >>>>=20 >>>> at quick glance it sounds like a bug in pkg I ll have a look at it ne= xt week >>>>=20 >>>> Bapt >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> After deeper analysis, I figure pkg is right and each time it claims a= need for >>> After a deeper analysis: >>> 32bits libs, they are actually needed=2E for reported ports, I think t= he >>> PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=3Dyes does not work yet with newer pkg version= =2E >>>=20 >>> I have found while analysing to potential bug at pkg install time for = people not >>> using pkgbase, which I will work on fixing, not nothing wrong regardin= g the :32 >>> handling at pkg build time (aka what you face in poudriere)=2E >>>=20 >>> I may be wrong, but I am not sure I am=2E >>>=20 >>> For people who haven't notice one of the major change of pkg 2=2Ex is = tracking 32 >>> bit libraries (and potentially linux one, off for now) AND tracking ba= se >>> libraries always=2E >>>=20 >>> After a deeper analysis: >>> My understanding if poudriere with PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=3Dyes would= work ok as >>> if, if the building jail was built using pkgbase=2E >>>=20 >>> What poudriere lacks for the options if gathering base libaries to con= sider them >>> as provided=2E >>>=20 >>> Note that pkg at runtime if not running on a system install using pkgb= ase, will >>> scan for base libraries=2E (Note this is where I found the bug I am in= teresting >>> in: it does not scan for 32bit libraries yet, which make pkg check -d = unhappy) >>>=20 >>> Best regards, >>> Bapt >>>=20 >>=20 >> And I was wrong about the pkg install bug, we do scan for 32bit livrari= es, so >> everything should be fine=2E > >Bapt, thanks for the analysis=2E > >SO I gather I need to rebuild my jails from scratch, possibly from pkgbas= e, but I'm not sure what I can do about my head jail which I build from sou= rce, and do also use to generate pkgbase packages for my desktops/laptop et= c=2E > >Or maybe I'm completely missing the point=2E > I will look into making poudriere support this properly next week bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BF328CA3-A975-44D3-9A60-D597E39CC8BA>