From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 20 00:28:02 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D577B1065675
	for <doc@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from pittgoth.com (pittgoth.com [205.134.163.206])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B848FC1B
	for <doc@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost.fbsdsecure.org (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pittgoth.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBK0Rt9R058177
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:27:56 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:27:47 -0500
From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To: bootiack@yahoo.com
Message-Id: <20081219192747.1edea542.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <329017.49550.qm@web110608.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <329017.49550.qm@web110608.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: section 4.5.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:28:02 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:28:55 -0800 (PST)
G <bootiack@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I was schooled in IRC about how 'portsnap fetch update' is the best way to update ports, not 'portsnap update' as listed in section 4.5.1.  Perhaps that section could be changed to 'portsnap fetch update'.  
> 
> Just an idea.
> thx

Looking at my local source, I am unable to find an actual
"portsnap update" in the section; however, I have appened the
following to the end of that section:


    <para>To run both processes consecutively, issue the following
      command:</para>

    <screen>&prompt.root; <userinput>portsnap fetch update</userinput></screen>


This change is in my local tree and should go in later on
this week.  Thanks,

-- 
Tom Rhodes